20
Jul

I’ve just returned to NYC from Podcamp Boston 3.0. This year’s PCB was, as always, a wonderful experience. I sincerely thank the organizers for all their hard work, and the attendees for contributing. However, PCB3 was not without it’s problems. The energy and attendance were both very low. Cost and date seemed to cause universal consternation, and ’social media’ rather than ‘podcasting’ seemed to dominate discussion. Having said that, Podcamp was still successful. Below are the + and - of the conference. I think that by a healthy discussion of what worked and what did not work will help us grow our community.

The Good:
- The people, people, people!
- The hallway! Podcamp hallways are where the action is, and this year was no exception. Impromptu songs, networking, business, and friendships sprung up everywhere.
- The sessions! Always very wiki-like, although I arrive at PDB3 a tad late, I caught some amazing sessions run by amazing people. Needless to say, I learned a ton.

The Bad:
- The People! This year’s PCB was missing a lot of people and organizations that have had previous years’ so bitchin. Why?
- The cost! Wasn’t “Podcamps should be free” a motto last year?
- The date! Podcamp Boston 3.0 came less than a year after 2.0, and less than three months after Podcamp NYC 2.0 - burnout, anyone?
- The Narcissism! The social media community MUST do more than just talk about our shiney toys lest we relegate ourselves to irrlevence.

What we can do:
- Invite your friends and explain to them why you’re passionate about what social media does for you.
- Stop bitching, start doing - in-hallway sessions are great, but we need to start acting on all our great ideas. This year’s Podcamp NYC education initiative was a great example.
- Constructively criticize! Let’s all work together to grow our family of content producers by talking about what can be improved on next year. Complaining is one thing, but remember the organizers work long hours to put these UnConferences together. Tell them what worked for you, and what did not.
- Communicate! We’ll grow our base of consumers and producers by speaking normal-person language. How can we explain what we do and why we do it WITHOUT jargon? Believe it or not, phrases like “I’m totally gonna Twitter my Flickr at the Podcamp, then Qik the shit out of my Seesmic,” can be alienating to some n00bs. ;)

What do you think? What can Podcamps to to better integrate with their local communities, engage a more diverse demographic, attract young people, and DO something?

Dan on Twitter.

Thanks!

This site contains blog entries, mobile updates, podcasts, pictures, video, and links - the best way to get all of this is to add the feed. Thanks!

Category : Social Media / Travel

Trackbacks & Pingbacks


Comments

David fisher July 21, 2008

I have my own thoughts on Podcamp Boston 2 on my blog here. Overall I just felt that the vibe was less energetic, and more professional for better or worse. http://whatisnoise.com/2008/07/podcamp-boston-3-pcb3-thoughts-vs-podcamp-boston-2.html

tinku gallery July 21, 2008

This was my first PodCamp and I thought overall it was a great experience and didn’t mind the $50 fee. I did feel though that the audience was primarily very techie and not very diverse in terms of ethnicity. Partly this is because it was Boston which in my experience of living there is a fairly segregated city despite its diversity - it would be different in other cities I am guessing (hoping). It would be good if organizers put out a call to attendees or volunteers to spread the word to other socio-economic and ethnic communities.

I found that the sessions I got most out of were the really practical ones — i.e. case studies or how-to sessions. It would be good to have a track for people newer to social media.

I also wish there was a way to encourage people to mix more — both online or offline. Not sure how to do this!

Dan,

A few comments regarding increasing people’s focus and the learning potential of podcamp:
1) Increase critical thinking. Reduce uncritical self-congratulation. Relegate all the “stars” to a couple panels. The stars talk plenty every day. They can chat in hallways. Give the floor to thoughtful people who haven’t garnered airtime and who have something pithy and/or new to say.
2) Do your own learning. Organize all sessions into two tracks: “101″ and “in the scene”. While anyone could attend anything, talks would not be diluted by lowest common denominator. I saw inappropriate novice questions destroy talks’ value and know-it-all discourse leave novices in the dark.
3) Commit to learning. Challenge habits. Allow presenters to prohibit computing. Some learning requires full attention.
4) Increase socializing. Keep traffic dense and short at a more compact venue: The HMS ammenities were FANTAStic. The quiet places and public places worked. The trekking did NOT encourage socializing.
5) Make the things we talk about. Peoples’ media. Affordable production, Self-determination. Require one a.m. and one p.m. session per day at which people make some content. Talking-about is more powerful learning when coupled with doing.
6) Keeps things lively. One session of lightning talks per day.
7) Increase resourcefulness. Charge $0 or $250.
8) Test potential commitment. Charge $250. An experiment worth doing after this one. Spend it on…venue and/or production quality or on charity; NOT on swag, comforts or stars. Find out how session quality differs at $250 a head.

DHP July 24, 2008

You all are amazing - thanks for the constructive and positive feedback!

Leave a comment